Non-invasive prenatal testing of fetal aneuploidies using a new method based on digital droplet PCR and cell free fetal DNA
Wang, H.; Yang, Z.; Picchiassi, E.; Tarquini, F.; Coata, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Di Renzo, G. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundCurrent next generation sequencing (NGS) and microarray based Non-Invasive Prenatal Tests (NIPT), used for the detection of common fetal trisomies, are still expensive, time consuming and need to be performed in centralized laboratories. To improve NIPT in clinical routine practice as universal prenatal screening, we have developed a digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) based assay called iSAFE NIPT using cell free fetal DNA (cffDNA) for detection of fetal trisomies 13, 18 and 21 in a single reaction with advantage of high diagnostic accuracy and reduced cost. Materials and MethodsWe first used artificial DNA samples to evaluate analytical sensitivity and specificity of the iSAFE NIPT. Next, we analysed 269 plasma samples for the clinical validation of iSAFE NIPT. Fifty-eight of these, including five trisomies 21, two trisomies 18 and one trisomy 13 were utilised to establish the assay cut-off values based on ratios between chromosome counts. The remaining 211 plasma samples, including 10 trisomies 21, were analysed to evaluate iSAFE NIPT clinical performance. ResultsiSAFE NIPT achieved a 100% analytical sensitivity (95% CI 94.9-100% trisomy 21; 79.4-100% trisomy 18; 73.5-100% trisomy 13) and 100% specificity (95% CI 96.3-100% trisomy 21; 97.6-100% trisomy 18; 97.6-100% trisomy 13). It also achieved a 100% clinical sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 detection in the 211 clinical samples (95% CI for sensitivity is 69.1-100%, and 95% CI for specificity is 98.2-100%). ConclusionsThe iSAFE NIPT is a highly multiplexed ddPCR based assay for detection of fetal trisomies from maternal blood. Based on clinical validation, the iSAFE NIPT has high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. It can be decentralized in routine clinical laboratories, is fast, easy to use and economical comparing to current NIPT.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A simple, cost-effective and extraction-free molecular diagnostic test for sickle cell disease in noninvasive buccal swab specimen for a limited-resource setting 95%
- Analytical performance of a highly sensitive system to detect gene variants using next-generation sequencing for lung cancer companion diagnostics 94%
- Evaluation of commercial qPCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of nanopore sequencing on polar bodies for routine pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy 94%
- Clinical application of ISO and CEN/TS standards for liquid biopsies - information everybody wants but nobody wants to pay for 94%
- Integrative assessment of total and intact HIV-1 reservoir by a five-region multiplexed Rainbow digital PCR assay 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Potential and Limitations of the MinION Nanopore array for miRNA-Enabled Early Cancer Detection 93%
- Investigating the performance of Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing with respect to Illumina microarrays and short-read sequencing 91%
- Improved Degradome Sequencing Protocol via Reagent Recycling from sRNAseq Library Preparations 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.