Auto-segmentation of the parotid glands on MR images of head and neck cancer patients with deep learning strategies
Kieselmann, J. P.; Fuller, C. D.; Gurney-Champion, O. J.; Oelfke, U.
Show abstract
Adaptive online MRI-guided radiotherapy of head and neck cancer requires the reliable segmentation of the parotid glands as important organs at risk in clinically acceptable time frames. This can hardly be achieved by manual contouring. We therefore designed deep learning-based algorithms which automatically perform this task. Imaging data comprised two datasets: 27 patient MR images (T1-weighted and T2-weighted) and eight healthy volunteer MR images (T2-weighted), together with manually drawn contours by an expert. We used four different convolutional neural network (CNN) designs that each processed the data differently, varying the dimensionality of the input. We assessed the segmentation accuracy calculating the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD) and mean surface distance (MSD) between manual and auto-generated contours. We benchmarked the developed methods by comparing to the inter-observer variability and to atlas-based segmentation. Additionally, we assessed the generalisability, strengths and limitations of deep learning-based compared to atlas-based methods in the independent volunteer test dataset. With a mean DSC of 0.85{+/-} 0.11 and mean MSD of 1.82 {+/-}1.94 mm, a 2D CNN could achieve an accuracy comparable to that of an atlas-based method (DSC: 0.85 {+/-}0.05, MSD: 1.67 {+/-}1.21 mm) and the inter-observer variability (DSC: 0.84 {+/-}0.06, MSD: 1.50 {+/-}0.77 mm) but considerably faster (<1s v.s. 45 min). Adding information (adjacent slices, fully 3D or multi-modality) did not further improve the accuracy. With additional preprocessing steps, the 2D CNN was able to generalise well for the fully independent volunteer dataset (DSC: 0.79 {+/-}0.10, MSD: 1.72 {+/-}0.96 mm) We demonstrated the enormous potential for the application of CNNs to segment the parotid glands for online MRI-guided radiotherapy. The short computation times render deep learning-based methods suitable for online treatment planning workflows.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality Assurance Assessment of Intra-Acquisition Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration and Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 97%
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 96%
- PSMA-Hornet: fully-automated, multi-target segmentation of healthy organs in PSMA PET/CT images 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Rectal Tumor Segmentation with Anomaly Fusion Derived from Anatomical Inpainting: A Multicenter Study 94%
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 94%
- A multimodal computational pipeline for 3D histology of the human brain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Segmentation stability of human head and neck medical images for radiotherapy applications under de-identification conditions: benchmarking for data sharing and artificial intelligence use-cases 98%
- Deep-Learning-Based Generation of Synthetic High-Resolution MRI from Low-Resolution MRI for Use in Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy 96%
- Leveraging intelligent optimization for automated, cardiac-sparing accelerated partial breast treatment planning 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a High-Performance Multiparametric MRI Oropharyngeal Primary Tumor Auto-Segmentation Deep Learning Model and Investigation of Input Channel Effects: Results from a Prospective Imaging Registry 96%
- Auto-Detection and Segmentation of Involved Lymph Nodes in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer Using a Convolutional Deep Learning Neural Network 95%
- Morphological changes after cranial fractionated photon radiotherapy: localized loss of white matter and grey matter volume with increasing dose 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.