A Working Model to Inform Risk-Based Back to Work Strategies
Meier, K.; Curnow, K. J.; Vavrek, D.; Moon, J.; Farh, K.; Chian, M.; Ragusa, R.; de Feo, E.; Febbo, P. G.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced many businesses to close or move to remote work to reduce the potential spread of disease. Employers desiring a return to onsite work want to understand their risk for having an infected employee on site and how best to mitigate this risk. Here, we modelled a range of key metrics to help inform return to work policies and procedures, including evaluating the benefit and optimal design of a SARS-CoV-2 employee screening program. MethodsWe modeled a range of input variables including prevalence of COVID-19, time infected, number of employees, test sensitivity and specificity, test turnaround time, number of times tested within the infectious period, and sample pooling. We modeled the impact of these input variables on several output variables: number of healthy employees; number of infected employees; number of test positive and test negative employees; number of true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative employees; positive and negative predictive values; and time an infected, potentially contagious employee is on site. ResultsWe show that an employee screening program can reduce the risk for onsite transmission across different prevalence values and group sizes. For example, at a pre-test asymptomatic community prevalence of 0.5% (5 in 1000) with an employee group size of 500, the risk for at least one infected employee on site is 91.8%, with 3 asymptomatic infected employees predicted within those 500 employees. Implementing a SARS-CoV-2 baseline screen with an 80% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity would reduce the risk of at least one infected employee on site to 39.4% and the predicted number of infected employees onsite (false negatives) to 1. Repetitive testing is required for ongoing vigilance of onsite employees. The expected number of days an infected employee is on site depends on test sensitivity, testing interval, and turnaround time. If the test interval is longer than the infectious period ([~]14 days for COVID-19), testing will not detect the infected employee. Sample pooling reduces the number of tests performed, thereby reducing testing costs. However, the pooling methodology (eg, 1-stage vs 2-stage pooling, pool size) will impact the number of employees that screen positive, thereby affected the number of employees eligible to return to onsite work. ConclusionsThe modeling presented here can be used to help employers understand their risk for having an infected employee on site. Further, it details how an employee screening program can reduce this risk and shows how screening performance and frequency impact the effectiveness of a screening program. The primary factors determining the effectiveness of a screening program are test sensitivity and frequency of testing. DisclaimerThis publication is offered to businesses/employers as a model of potential risk arising from COVID19 in the workplace. While believed to be based on reliable data, the model described herein has not been prospectively validated and should not be relied upon for any purpose other than as an aid to understand the potential impacts of a number of variables on the risk of having COVID19 positive employees on a worksite. Decisions related to workplace safety; COVID19 related workplace testing; programs and procedures should be based upon your actual data and applicable laws and public health orders.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Optimal COVID-19 Testing Strategies for Schools and Businesses: Balancing Testing Frequency, Individual Test Technology, and Cost 95%
- Modeling transmission dynamics and effectiveness of worker screening programs for SARS-CoV-2 in pork processing plants 94%
- A holistic approach for suppression of COVID-19 spread in workplaces and universities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Infection control strategies in essential industries: using COVID-19 in the food industry to model economic and public health trade-offs 94%
- Results from Canton Grisons of Switzerland Suggest Repetitive Testing Reduces SARS-CoV-2 Incidence (February-March 2021) 94%
- Modeling the systemic risks of COVID-19 on the wildland firefighting workforce 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A model for COVID-19 with isolation, quarantine and testing as control measures 92%
- Estimating the impact of test-trace-isolate-quarantine systems on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Australia 92%
- Changing social contact patterns among US workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: April 2020 to December 2021 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Surveillance-to-Diagnostic Testing Program for Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections on a Large, Urban Campus - Georgia Institute of Technology, Fall 2020 92%
- The Epidemiological Implications of Jails for Community, Corrections Officer, and Incarcerated Population Risks from COVID-19 92%
- Theoretical framework for retrospective studies of the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.