Inhibitory control, personality, and manipulated ecological conditions influence foraging plasticity in the great tit
Coomes, J. R.; Davidson, G. L.; Reichert, M. S.; Kulahci, I. G.; Troisi, C. A.; Quinn, J. L.
Show abstract
O_LIOrganisms are consistently under selection to respond effectively to a diversity of, sometimes rapid, changes in their environment. Behavioural plasticity can allow individuals to do so instantaneously, but why individuals vary in this respect is poorly understood. Although personality and cognitive traits are often hypothesised to influence plasticity, the effects reported are highly inconsistent, which we hypothesise is because ecological context is usually not considered. C_LIO_LIHere we explore the roles of individual cognitive and personality variation - assayed using standard tasks for inhibitory control, a measure of self-control, and reactive-proactive personality axis (RPPA), respectively - in driving foraging plasticity, and asked how these effects varied across two experimentally manipulated ecological contexts: food value and predation risk. C_LIO_LIAfter great tits (Parus major) had initially been trained to retrieve high value food hidden in sand, they were then simultaneously offered the hidden food and an alternative food choice on the surface, that was either high or low value. Their choices were further examined under high and low perceived predation risk treatments. Individuals choices were classified in terms of whether they continued to forage on the hidden but familiar food source, or instead switched to the new visible food source. We defined the latter option as the plastic response. C_LIO_LIOur assays captured consistent differences among individuals in foraging behaviour. Both inhibitory control and exploration influenced whether birds switched from the familiar but hidden food source to the new alternative visible food on the surface. These effects depended on the relative value of the food items available and on the perceived level of predation risk, but also on the time scale over which the response was measured. C_LIO_LIOur results demonstrate how an executive cognitive function and one specific personality axis can simultaneously influence plasticity in a key functional behaviour. That their effects on foraging were primarily observed as interactions with food value or predation risk treatments also suggest that the population level consequences of behavioural mechanisms, such as these, may only be revealed across key ecological conditions or gradients. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Great tits show serial reversal learning in the perseverance phase but not in the new learning phase 97%
- Changes in movement characteristics in response to private and social information acquisition of socially foraging fish 96%
- Wild raccoons are more innovative but not bolder than another ecological generalist, the Virginia opossum, on a pull-string task 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Equal performance but distinct behaviors: Astatotilapia burtoni sex differences in a novel object recognition task and spatial maze 96%
- Response learning confounds accurate assays of inhibitory control 95%
- Cleaner wrasse failed in early testing stages of both visual and spatial Working Memory paradigms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- No reproductive benefits of dear enemy recognition in a territorial songbird 96%
- Stress activity is not predictive of coping style in North American red squirrels 94%
- Does genetic differentiation underlie behavioral divergence in response tomigration barriers in sticklebacks? A common garden experiment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.