Face masks for preventing respiratory infections in the community: A systematic review
Saijonkari, M.; Booth, N.; Isojarvi, J.; Finnila, J.; Makela, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Ministry of Social Affairs and Health in Finland commissioned this systematic literature review on the effectiveness and safety of using face masks in public environments in protecting against upper respiratory tract infections, to inform policy. Previous reviews have not clearly distinguished the context of mask use. MethodsThe review was completed within two weeks, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines where possible. The review looks at the effect of face coverings (surgical masks or cloth coverings, excluding FFP2 and FFP3 masks) in protecting against the transmission in droplet-mediated respiratory tract infections. Our review includes controlled trials or previous systematic reviews of mask use by the general public in public spaces, outside homes and healthcare facilities. ResultsThe systematic literature search identified five randomized trials. Use of masks prevented infections in one subgroup of one pilot study, so the effect of face masks on the transmission of infections outside the home appears small or nonexistent. Five of the eight systematic reviews showed no evidence of face masks being helpful in controlling the spread of respiratory infection or preventing exposure in healthy individuals. Meta-analyses often combined very heterogeneous studies and costs were not reported in any studies. ConclusionsRandomized studies on the effect of face coverings in the general population are few. The reported effect of masks used outside the home on transmission of droplet-mediated respiratory infections in the population is minimal or non-existent. It is difficult to distinguish the potential effect of masks from the effects of other protective measures. Summary boxO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this subject?C_ST_ABSPrevious reviews on the effectiveness and safety of use of face masks in protecting against upper respiratory tract infections have not clearly distinguished the context of mask use. They have combined very heterogeneous studies done in homes, health care settings, or public environments. What does this study add?Our systematic review on the use of face masks in public environments, done to inform an impending policy decision, found five randomized trials (RCTs) and eight reviews. Use of masks prevented infections in one subgroup of one RCT, so the effect of face masks appears small or nonexistent.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and outcomes of co-infection and super-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 93%
- The new silicone N99 half-piece respirator, VJR-NMU N99: A novel and effective tool to prevent COVID-19 93%
- The impact of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) design features on the transmission of viruses, including the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19): a systematic review of humidity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and associated factors in health care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Cleaning and disinfecting surfaces in hospitals and long-term care facilities for reducing hospital and facility-acquired bacterial and viral infections: A systematic review 93%
- Exposition to airborne SARS-CoV-2 in household and hospitals settings as studied by a vacuum cleaner as a high-powered air sampler 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and effectiveness of hand hygiene-related practices used community settings for removal of organisms from hands: A systematic review 93%
- Availability, scope, and quality of monkeypox clinical management guidelines globally: a systematic review 90%
- Use of Interviewer-Administered Telephone Surveys during Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics: A Scoping Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning design features on the transmission of viruses, including the 2019 novel coronavirus: a systematic review of ventilation and coronavirus 93%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 92%
- Infection prevention and control measures to reduce the transmission of mpox: a systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: a systematic review protocol 94%
- Decontamination of filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave 92%
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.