Back

uPTI: uniaxial permittivity tensor imaging of intrinsic density and anisotropy

Yeh, L.-H.; Ivanov, I. E.; Chhun, B. B.; Guo, S.-M.; Hashemi, E.; Byrum, J. R.; Perez-Bermejo, J. A.; Wang, H.; Yu, Y.; Kazansky, P. G.; Conklin, B. R.; Han, M. H.; Mehta, S. B.

2020-12-16 biophysics
10.1101/2020.12.15.422951 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biological architecture is intrinsically tensorial. The permittivity tensor (PT) of biological material reports the density, angular anisotropy, symmetry, and 3D orientation of biomolecules. High-resolution measurement of PT can enable quantitative and label-free analysis of organelle, cell, and tissue architecture, but remains challenging. We report uniaxial permittivity tensor imaging (uPTI), a label-free computational imaging method for volumetric measurement of PT with diffraction-limited resolution. uPTI encodes the components of PT into intensity modulations using oblique illumination and polarization-resolved imaging. The high-dimensional data is decoded with a vectorial image formation model and a multi-channel convex optimization, assuming that the molecular distribution in each voxel has uniaxial symmetry. We describe a modular implementation of uPTI that can be multiplexed with complementary imaging modalities. We report volumes of uPT in mouse brain tissue, SARS-CoV-2 infected cardiomyocytes, RSV infected A549 cells, H&E stained tissue sections, isotropic beads, and anisotropic glass targets. uPTI enabled volumetric imaging of the 3D orientation and symmetry of organelles, cells, and tissue components with higher spatio-angular resolution than current vectorial tomography, ptychography, and light-field microscopy methods. We provide an open source implementation of the image formation model and reconstruction algorithms.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.