Back

No detectable signal for ongoing genetic recombination in SARS-CoV-2

Richard, D.; Owen, C. J.; van Dorp, L.; Balloux, F.

2020-12-15 genomics
10.1101/2020.12.15.422866 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented global sequencing effort of its viral agent SARS-CoV-2. The first whole genome assembly of SARS-CoV-2 was published on January 5 2020. Since then, over 150,000 high-quality SARS-CoV-2 genomes have been made available. This large genomic resource has allowed tracing of the emergence and spread of mutations and phylogenetic reconstruction of SARS-CoV-2 lineages in near real time. Though, whether SARS-CoV-2 undergoes genetic recombination has been largely overlooked to date. Recombination-mediated rearrangement of variants that arose independently can be of major evolutionary importance. Moreover, the absence of recombination is a key assumption behind the application of phylogenetic inference methods. Here, we analyse the extant genomic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 and show that, to date, there is no detectable hallmark of recombination. We assess our detection power using simulations and validate our method on the related MERS-CoV for which we report evidence for widespread genetic recombination.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Virus Evolution
◐ 155 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
PLOS Genetics
● 862 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Microbial Genomics
● 225 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.0%
Similar papers in this journal
5
BMC Biology
○ 265 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
● 51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.2%
10
Genome Medicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.9%
12
PLOS Pathogens
● 820 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
13
Genome Biology and Evolution
◐ 338 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
14
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.1%
15
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
17
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.8%
18
Viruses
○ 332 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
The ISME Journal
◐ 228 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
21
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.1%
23
Peer Community Journal
● 281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
25
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
26
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
27
Biology Letters
● 76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
28
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
29
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
30
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.