Back

Frequency-Selective Oscillatory Control of Working Memory Robustness to Distractors

Novikov, N.; Gutkin, B.

2020-12-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.12.13.422600 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Working memory (WM) is the brains ability to retain information that is not directly available from the sensory systems. WM retention is accompanied by sustained firing rate modulation and changes of the large-scale oscillatory profile. Among other changes, beta-band activity elevates in task-related regions, presumably stabilizing WM retention. Alpha-band activity, in turn, is stronger in task-irrelevant regions, serving to protect WM trace from distracting information. Although a large body of experimental evidence links neural oscillations to WM functions, theoretical understanding of their interrelations is still incomplete. In this study, we used a computational approach to explore a potential role of beta and alpha oscillations in control of WM stability. First, we examined a single bistable module that served as a discrete object representation and was resonant in the beta-band in the active state. We demonstrated that beta-band input produced differentially stronger excitatory effect on the module in the active state compared to the background state, while this difference decreased with the input frequency. We then considered a system of two competing modules, selective for a stimulus and for a distractor, respectively. We simulated a task, in which a stimulus was loaded into the first module, then an identical oscillatory input to both modules was turned on, after which a distractor was presented to the second module. We showed that beta-band input prevented loading of high-amplitude distractors and erasure of the stimulus from WM. On the contrary, alpha-band input promoted loading of low-amplitude distractors and the stimulus erasure. In summary, we demonstrated that stability of WM trace could be controlled by global oscillatory input in a frequency-dependent manner via controlling the level of competition between stimulus-encoding and distractor-encoding circuits. Such control is possible due to difference in the resonant and non-linear properties between the background and the active states.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.0%
3
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.7%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
11
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
13
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.0%
15
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.6%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
19
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%