Pointing in depth is shaped by a natural grasping distance prior
Wiesing, M.; Kartashovn, T.; Zimmermann, E.
Show abstract
Vision in depth is distorted. A similar distortion can be observed for pointing to visual targets in depth. It has been suggested that pointing errors in depth reflect the visual distortion. However, much research has suggested that in case visual information is not rich enough, the sensorimotor system involves prior knowledge to optimally plan movement trajectories. Here, we show that pointing in depth is guided by a prior that biases movements toward the natural grasping distance at which object manipulation is usually performed. To dissociate whether pointing is guided by distorted vision only or whether it takes into account a natural grasping distance prior, we adapted pointing movements. Participants received visual feedback about the success of their pointing once the movement was finished. We distorted the feedback to signal either that pointing was not far enough or in separate sessions that pointing was too far. Participants adapted to this artificial error by either extending or shortening their pointing movements. The generalization of pointing adaptation revealed a bias in movement planning that is inconsistent with pointing being guided only by distorted vision but with the involvement of knowledge about the natural grasping distance. Adaptation was strongest for pointing movements to a middle position that corresponds to the natural grassing distance and it was weakest for movements leading away from it. It has been demonstrated that pointing adaptation in depth changes visual perception (Volcic et al., 2013). We also wondered how effects of pointing adaptation on visual space would generalize in depth.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal perturbations cause movement-context independent but modality-specific sensorimotor adaptation 98%
- Target interception in virtual reality is better for natural versus unnatural trajectory shapes and orientations 97%
- Instruction Alters The Influence Of Allocentric Landmarks In A Reach Task 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for an efferent-based prediction contributing to implicit motor adaptation 97%
- Asymmetry in kinematic generalisation between visual and passive lead-in movements are consistent with a forward model in the sensorimotor system 97%
- Motor Learning Without Moving: Proprioceptive and Predictive Hand Localization After Passive Visuoproprioceptive Discrepancy Training 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.