Back

Cicada timetree by BEAST v1.X verified the recently and exponentially increasing base substitution rates

Osozawa, S.; Wakabayashi, J.

2020-12-03 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.12.03.409599 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Following the recent publication of global cicada phylogenetic trees by Marshall et al. (2018), ukasik et al. (2018), and Simon et al. (2019), we developed a new dated tree incorporating mostly endemic east Asian cicada data for totally 113 specimens, using the mostly advanced BEAST v1.X software applied the relaxed clock model. Fossil calibrations as old as Triassic were adopted after Moulds (2018), and a Quaternary geological event calibration was adopted following Osozawa et al. (2012), applying the calibration function of BEAST. Our timetree suggests that Tettigarctidae had cicada basal lineage as old as 200 Ma, and Derotettiginae was next as old as 100 Ma. Tibicininae was a sister of the resting Cicadidae, and Tettigomyiinae, Cicadettinae, and Cicadina started simultaneous branching and radiation around 40 Ma. We made a base substitution rate vs age diagram based on the timetree using the BEAST function, and it strongly suggested an exponential increase of base substitution rate approaching the present. The consequent increased cicada biodiversity including generation of cryptic species might have been driven by the generation and spreading of C4 grasses and the following Quaternary glaciations and severe environmental change.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.4%
2
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.2%
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
6
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
7
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
10
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
15
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.0%
17
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
24
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%