Back

Supervised Image Classification Algorithm Using Representative Spatial Texture Features: Application to COVID-19 Diagnosis Using CT Images

Belkhatir, Z.; Estepar, R. S. J.; Tannenbaum, A. R.

2020-12-04 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2020.12.03.20243493 medRxiv
Show abstract

Although there is no universal definition for texture, the concept in various forms is nevertheless widely used and a key element of visual perception to analyze images in different fields. The present works main idea relies on the assumption that there exist representative samples, which we refer to as references as well, i.e., "good or bad" samples that represent a given dataset investigated in a particular data analysis problem. These representative samples need to be accounted for when designing predictive models with the aim of improving their performance. In particular, based on a selected subset of texture gray-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCMs) from the training cohort, we propose new representative spatial texture features, which we incorporate into a supervised image classification pipeline. The pipeline relies on the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm along with Bayesian optimization and the Wasserstein metric from optimal mass transport (OMT) theory. The selection of the best, "good and bad," GLCM references is considered for each classification label and performed during the training phase of the SVM classifier using a Bayesian optimizer. We assume that sample fitness is defined based on closeness (in the sense of the Wasserstein metric) and high correlation (Spearmans rank sense) with other samples in the same class. Moreover, the newly defined spatial texture features consist of the Wasserstein distance between the optimally selected references and the remaining samples. We assessed the performance of the proposed classification pipeline in diagnosing the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from computed tomographic (CT) images.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.6%
2
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
3
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
6
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
10
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
21
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
24
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
25
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%