Back

Temperature effects on individual-level parasitism translate into predictable effects on parasitism in populations

Kirk, D.; O'Connor, M. I.; Mordecai, E. A.

2020-12-02 ecology
10.1101/2020.12.01.406884 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Parasitism is expected to change in a warmer future, but whether warming leads to substantial increases in parasitism remains unclear. Understanding how warming effects on parasitism in individual hosts (e.g., parasite load) translate to effects on population-level parasitism (e.g., prevalence, R0) remains a major knowledge gap. We analyzed the temperature dependence of parasitism at both host and population levels in thirteen empirical vector-borne host-parasite systems and found a strong, significant positive correlation between the thermal optima of individual- and population-level parasitism. We also found a significant, positive correlation in eleven environmentally-transmitted parasite systems, though several of these systems exhibited thermal optima >5{o}C apart between individual and population levels. Similarly, parasitism thermal optima were close to host performance thermal optima in vector-borne systems but not in environmentally-transmitted systems. We then adapted and simulated simple models for both transmission modes and found a similar pattern to the empirical systems: thermal optima in vector-borne systems were more strongly correlated across scales compared to environmentally-transmitted systems. Generally, our results suggest that information on the temperature-dependence, and specifically the thermal optimum, at either the individual- or population-level should provide a useful--though not quantitatively exact--baseline for predicting temperature dependence at the other level, especially in vector-borne parasite systems. Environmentally-transmitted parasitism may operate by a different set of rules, in which temperature-dependence is decoupled in some systems, requiring the need for trait-based studies of temperature-dependence at individual and population levels.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.