Back

On testing structural identifiability by a simple scaling method: relying on scaling symmetries can be misleading

Villaverde, A. F.; Massonis Feixas, G.

2020-12-01 systems biology
10.1101/2020.11.30.403956 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A recent paper (Castro M, de Boer RJ, "Testing structural identifiability by a simple scaling method", PLOS Computational Biology, 2020, 16(11):e1008248) introduces the Scaling Invariance Method (SIM) for analysing structural local identifiability and observability. These two properties define mathematically the possibility of determining the values of the parameters (identifiability) and states (observability) of a dynamic model by observing its output. In this note we warn that SIM considers scaling symmetries as the only possible cause of non-identifiability and non-observability. We show that other types of symmetries can cause the same problems without being detected by SIM, and that in those cases the method may yield a wrong result. Finally, we demonstrate how to analyse structural local identifiability and observability with symbolic computation tools that do not exhibit those issues.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.