Back

Landmark-Based Turn-by-Turn Instructions Enhance Incidental Spatial Knowledge Acquisition

Wunderlich, A.; Grieger, S.; Gramann, K.

2020-12-01 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.11.30.403428 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The augmentation of landmarks in auditory navigation instructions had been shown to improve incidental spatial knowledge acquisition during assisted navigation. Here, two driving simulator experiments are reported that replicated this effect even when adding a three-week delay between navigation and spatial tasks and varying the degree of detail in the provided landmark information. Performance in free- and cued-recall of landmarks and driving the route again without assistance demonstrated increased landmark and route knowledge when navigating with landmark-based compared to standard instructions. The results emphasize that small changes to existing navigation systems can foster spatial knowledge acquisition during every-day navigation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.3%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Experimental Brain Research
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Cognition
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Behavioural Brain Research
○ 77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
Frontiers in Psychology
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
7
European Journal of Neuroscience
○ 189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
8
Journal of Vision
● 110 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
Journal of Biomechanics
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Cortex
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
11
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.8%
13
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.8%
14
Journal of Neurophysiology
● 302 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Vision Research
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Human Movement Science
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Neuroscience
○ 97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Behavior Research Methods
○ 30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
● 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
23
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Peer Community Journal
● 281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Consciousness and Cognition
○ 19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
○ 122 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Biology Open
● 156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
○ 40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
30
Behavioural Processes
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.