Back

Neural Flip-Flops III: Stomatogastric Ganglion

Yoder, L.

2020-12-01 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.11.29.403154 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The stomatogastric ganglion (STG) is a group of about 30 neurons that resides on the stomach in decapod crustaceans. Its two central pattern generators (CPGs) control the chewing action of the gastric mill and the peristaltic movement of food through the pylorus to the gut. The STG has been studied extensively because it has properties that are common to all nervous systems and because of the small number of neurons and other features that make it convenient to study. So many details are known that the STG is considered a classic test case in neuroscience for the reductionist strategy of explaining the emergence of macro-level phenomena from micro-level data. In spite of the intense scrutiny the STG has received, how it generates its rhythmic patterns of bursts remains unknown. The explicit neural networks proposed here model the pyloric CPG of the American lobster (Homarus americanus). The models share enough significant features with the lobsters CPG that they may be considered first approximations, or perhaps simplified versions, of STG architecture. The similarities include 1) mostly inhibitory synapses; 2) pairs of cells with reciprocal inhibitory inputs, complementary outputs that are approximately 180 degrees out of phase, and state changes occurring with the high output changing first; 3) cells that have reciprocal, inhibitory inputs with more than one other cell; and 4) six cells that produce coordinated oscillations with the same period, four phases distributed approximately uniformly over the period, and half of the burst durations approximately 1/4 of the period and the other half 3/8. Each models connectivity is explicit, and its operation depends only on minimal neuron capabilities of excitation and inhibition. One model performs a function that fills a gap in standard ring oscillators. It is apparently new to engineering, making it an example of neuroscience and logic circuit design informing each other. Some models are derived from standard circuit designs by moving each negation symbol from one end of a connection to the other. This does not change the logic of the network, but it changes each logic gate to one that can be implemented with a single neuron.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.9%
4
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
5
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.1%
8
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
11
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
21
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%