AI4CoV: Matching COVID-19 Patients to Treatment Options Using Artificial Intelligence
Hsu, A. I.; Yeh, A.; Chen, S.-L.; Yeh, J. J.; Lv, D.; Hsu, J. Y.-j.; Huang, P. J.
Show abstract
We developed AI4CoV, a novel AI system to match thousands of COVID-19 clinical trials to patients based on each patients eligibility to clinical trials in order to help physicians select treatment options for patients. AI4CoV leveraged Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning to parse through eligibility criteria of trials and patients clinical manifestations in their clinical notes, both presented in English text, to accomplish 92.76% AUROC on a cross-validation test with 3,156 patient-trial pairs labeled with ground truth of suitability. Our retrospective multiple-site review shows that according to AI4CoV, severe patients of COVID-19 generally have less treatment options suitable for them than mild and moderate patients and that suitable and unsuitable treatment options are different for each patient. Our results show that the general approach of AI4CoV is useful during the early stage of a pandemic when the best treatments are still unknown.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing A Deep Learning Natural Language Processing Algorithm For Automated Reporting Of Adverse Drug Reactions 94%
- Natural language processing for scalable feature engineering and ultra-high-dimensional confounding adjustment in healthcare database studies 94%
- A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trial Risk Assessment 95%
- Clinical Knowledge Extraction via Sparse Embedding Regression (KESER) with Multi-Center Large Scale Electronic Health Record Data 94%
- Exploring the Feasibility of Using Real-World Data from a Large Clinical Data Research Network to Simulate Clinical Trials of Alzheimer’s Disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COHD-COVID: Columbia Open Health Data for COVID-19 Research 94%
- Clinical Characteristics And Prognostic Factors For ICU Admission Of Patients With COVID-19 Using Machine Learning And Natural Language Processing 92%
- Optimal policy determination in sequential systemic and locoregional therapy of oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas: A patient-physician digital twin dyad with deep Q-learning for treatment selection 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Application of Pharmacological Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms Phenotyping Algorithms Using Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Records Data 94%
- Framework for Identifying Drug Repurposing Candidates from Observational Healthcare Data 94%
- Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Concept Embedding for Feature Engineering in Phenotyping 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.