Altered functional integration of brain activity is a marker of impaired cognitive performance following sleep deprivation
Cross, N.; Pomares, F. B.; Nguyen, A.; Perrault, A. A.; Jegou, A.; Uji, M.; Lee, K.; Razavipour, F.; Ali, O. B. K.; Aydin, U.; Benali, H.; Grova, C.; Dang-Vu, T. T.
Show abstract
Sleep deprivation (SD) leads to impairments in cognitive function. Here, we tested the hypothesis that cognitive changes in the sleep-deprived brain can be explained by information processing within and between large-scale cortical networks. We acquired functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans of 20 healthy volunteers during attention and executive tasks following a regular night of sleep, a night of sleep deprivation, and a recovery nap containing non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Overall, sleep deprivation was associated with increased cortex-wide functional integration, driven by a rise of integration within cortical networks. The ratio of within vs between network integration in the cortex increased further in the recovery nap, suggesting that prolonged wakefulness drives the cortex toward a state resembling sleep. This balance of integration and segregation in the sleep-deprived state was tightly associated with deficits in cognitive performance. This was a distinct and better marker of cognitive impairment than conventional indicators of homeostatic sleep pressure, as well as the pronounced thalamo-cortical connectivity changes that occurs towards falling asleep. Importantly, restoration of the balance between segregation and integration of cortical activity was also related to performance recovery after the nap, demonstrating a bi-directional effect. These results demonstrate that intra- and inter-individual differences in cortical network integration and segregation during task performance may play a critical role in vulnerability to cognitive impairment in the sleep deprived state. Significance StatementSleep deprivation has significant negative consequences for cognitive function. Understanding how changes in brain activity underpin changes in cognition is important not only to discover why performance declines following extended periods of wakefulness, but also for answering the fundamental question of why we require regular and recurrent sleep for optimal performance. Finding neural correlates that predict performance following sleep deprivation also has the potential to understand which individuals are particularly vulnerable to sleep deprivation, and what aspects of brain function may protect them from these negative consequences on performance. Finally, understanding how perturbations to regular (well-rested) brain functioning affect cognitive performance, will provide important insight into how underlying principles of information processing in the brain may support cognition generally.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional networks in the infant brain during sleep and wake states 95%
- Dynamic reconfiguration, fragmentation and integration of whole-brain modular structure across depths of unconsciousness 95%
- Local coupling between sleep spindles and slow oscillations supports the stabilization of motor memories 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sleep modulates neural timescales and spatiotemporal integration in the human cortex 97%
- Coordination of human hippocampal sharpwave-ripples during NREM sleep with cortical theta bursts, spindles, downstates and upstates 96%
- Relating pupil diameter and blinking to cortical activity and hemodynamics across arousal states 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducible, data-driven characterization of sleep based on brain dynamics and transitions from whole-night fMRI 97%
- Waveform detection by deep learning reveals multi-area spindles that are selectively modulated by memory load 96%
- State-dependent pontine ensemble dynamics and interactions with cortex across sleep states 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.