FiberAI: A Deep Learning model for automated analysis of nascent DNA Fibers
Mohsin, A.; Arnovitz, S.; Khan, A. A.; Gounari, F.
Show abstract
All life forms undergo cell division and are dependent on faithful DNA replication to maintain the stability of their genomes. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors can stress the replication process and multiple checkpoint mechanisms have evolved to ensure genome stability. Understanding these molecular mechanisms is crucial for preventing and treating genomic instability associated diseases including cancer. DNA replicating fiber fluorography is a powerful technique that directly visualizes the replication process and a cells response to replication stress. Analysis of DNA-fiber microscopy images provides quantitative information about replication fitness. However, a bottleneck for high throughput DNA-fiber studies is that quantitative measurements are laborious when performed manually. Here we introduce FiberAI, which uses state-of-the art deep learning frameworks to detect and quantify DNA-fibers in high throughput microscopy images. FiberAI efficiently detects DNA fibers, achieving a bounding box average precision score of 0.91 and a segmentation average precision score of 0.90. We then use FiberAI to measure the integrity of replication checkpoints. FiberAI is publicly available and allows users to view model predicted selections, add their own manual selections, and easily analyze multiple image sets. Thus, FiberAI can help elucidate DNA replication processes by streamlining DNA-fiber analyses.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Classification of Lipid Droplets in Quantitative Phase Images 95%
- High-volume, label-free imaging for quantifying single-cell dynamics in induced pluripotent stem cell colonies 95%
- FalseColor-Python: a rapid intensity-leveling and digital-staining package for fluorescence-based slide-free digital pathology 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.