Back

The Dutch Microbiome Project defines factors that shape the healthy gut microbiome

Gacesa, R.; Kurilshikov, A.; Vich Vila, A.; Sinha, T.; Klaassen, M. A. Y.; Bolte, L. A.; Andreu-Sanchez, S.; Chen, L.; Collij, V.; Hu, S.; Dekens, J. A. M.; Lenters, V. C.; Bjork, J. R.; Swarte, J. C.; Swertz, M. A.; Jansen, B. H.; Gelderloos-Arends, J.; Lifelines cohort study, ; Hofker, M.; Vermeulen, R. C. H.; Sanna, S.; Harmsen, H. J. M.; Wijmenga, C.; Fu, J.; Zhernakova, A.; Weersma, R. K.

2020-11-27 microbiology
10.1101/2020.11.27.401125 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The gut microbiome is associated with diverse diseases, but the universal signature of an (un)healthy microbiome remains elusive and there is a need to understand how genetics, exposome, lifestyle and diet shape the microbiome in health and disease. To fill this gap, we profiled bacterial composition, function, antibiotic resistance and virulence factors in the gut microbiomes of 8,208 Dutch individuals from a three-generational cohort comprising 2,756 families. We then correlated this to 241 host and environmental factors, including physical and mental health, medication use, diet, socioeconomic factors and childhood and current exposome. We identify that the microbiome is primarily shaped by environment and cohousing. Only [~]13% of taxa are heritable, which are enriched with highly prevalent and health-associated bacteria. By identifying 2,856 associations between microbiome and health, we find that seemingly unrelated diseases share a common signature that is independent of comorbidities. Furthermore, we identify 7,519 associations between microbiome features and diet, socioeconomics and early life and current exposome, of which numerous early-life and current factors are particularly linked to the microbiome. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive overview of gut microbiome and the underlying impact of heritability and exposures that will facilitate future development of microbiome-targeted therapies.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.