Naturalistic affective behaviors decoded from spectro-spatial features of multi-day human intracranial recordings
Bijanzadeh, M.; Khambhati, A. N.; Desai, M.; Wallace, D. L.; Shafi, A.; Dawes, H. E.; Sturm, V. E.; Chang, E. F.
Show abstract
Task-based studies have uncovered distributed neural networks that support emotions, but little is known about how these networks produce affective behaviors in non-laboratory, ecological settings. We obtained continuous intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) recordings from the emotion network in 11 patients with epilepsy during multi-day hospitalizations. We coded naturalistic affective behaviors (spontaneous expressions of positive or negative affect) from 116 hours of time-locked video recordings obtained over multiple days from subjects hospital rooms and utilized data driven classifiers to determine whether we could decode naturalistic affective behaviors from the neural data. Results indicated that binary within-subject random forest models could decode positive and negative affective behaviors from affectless behaviors (behaviors lacking valence) with up to 93% accuracy. Across the emotion network, positive and negative affective behaviors were associated with increased high frequency activity and decreased lower frequency activity. The anterior insula, amygdala, hippocampus, and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) made strong contributions to affective behaviors in general. In a subset of subjects, three-state decoders distinguished among the positive, negative, and affectless behaviors using the spectro-spatial features from the emotion network. This study demonstrates that multi-day, highly resolved iEEG recordings in cortical and deep brain structures can reveal the circuit-level physiology of affective behaviors. By measuring behavior in an ecologically valid setting, our findings provide novel insights into the spatially distributed dynamics of local neural populations underlying naturalistic affective behaviors. SignificancePrevious neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies have identified a distributed network that supports emotions, but much remains unknown about how this network produces affective behaviors in ecological settings. We used intracranial electroencephalography recordings from the emotion network to decode naturalistic affective behaviors--spontaneous expressions of positive and negative affect that occurred during multi-day hospital stays--from neural data in patients with epilepsy. Our results complement prior neuroscientific studies of emotion and offer novel insights into the spectral and spatial dynamics of the emotion network that characterize naturalistic affective behaviors. The present study suggests intracranial electroencephalography can uncover new details about emotion network physiology and help to expand current neuroanatomical frameworks of human emotions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive feedback, early sensory representations and fast responses to predicted stimuli depend on NMDA receptors 94%
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of successive activations across the human brain during simple arithmetic processing 94%
- Dynamics of neural microstates in the VTA-striatal-prefrontal loop during novelty exploration in the rat 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Direct brain recordings reveal continuous encoding of structure in random stimuli 93%
- Broadband slow-wave modulation in posterior and anterior cortex tracks distinct states of propofol-induced unconsciousness 93%
- Global Neural Oscillations Underlie Performance Variability and Attentional State Fluctuations in Humans 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intracerebral mechanisms explaining the impact of incidental feedback on mood state and risky choice 94%
- Boosting Brain Signal Variability Underlies Liberal Shifts in Decision Bias 94%
- Human endogenous oxytocin and its neural correlates show adaptive responses to social touch based on recent social context 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.