Back

Pediatric glioblastoma - unlike normal cells - are sensitive to the combination of vorinostat and olaparib and to its downstream effector - phosphorylated eIF2α

Eytan, K.; Versano, Z.; Leitner, M.; Paglin, S.; Toren, A.; Yalon, M.

2020-11-25 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.11.25.397497 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Current therapies offer only a short relief for patients with pediatric glioblastoma (PED-GBM). Therefore, expanding treatment options for this fatal disease is of utmost importance. We found that PED-GBM cell lines, originated from diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma expressing H3K27M mutation (DIPG), or from hemispheric glioma expressing H3G34R mutation, are sensitive to combinations of histone deacetylase and PARP-1 inhibitors (vorinostat with either olaparib or veliparib). These combinations led to an enhanced decrease in their survival, and to increased phosphorylation of eIF2. Experiments with the S51D phosphomimetic variant of eIF2 and with brain-penetrating inhibitors of phosphorylated eIF2 (p-eIF2) dephospohrylation, salubrinal and raphin1, showed that increased eIF2 phosphorylation diminished PED-GBM cell survival and sensitized them to PARP-1 inhibitors as well as to ionizing irradiation, which is the main treatment modality in these patients. PED-GBM cells were also remarkably more sensitive to combination of vorinostat and PARP-1 inhibitors and to salubrinal and raphin1 than normal human astrocytes and fibroblasts. Importantly, although the overall effect of increased eIF2 phosphorylation was a reduced survival of PED-GBM cells, it also increased the cellular level of MTH1, an enzyme that protects treated cells against the incorporation of oxidized nucleotides into nucleic acids, resulting in an enhanced decrease in cell survival in response to the combination of salubrinal and MTH1 inhibitor, TH588. Our results indicate that combinations of the FDA approved drugs, vorinostat and either veliparib or olaparib, could potentially be included in PED-GBM treatment protocols and that the effect of salubrinal and raphin1 on PED-GBM survival warrants further evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
2
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
7
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
20
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
21
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
26
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
30
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%