Transparent Machine Learning models for Rapid Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department: A multi-center evaluation
van Doorn, W.; Helmich, F.; van Dam, P. M. E. L.; Jacobs, L. H. J.; Stassen, P. M.; Bekers, O.; Meex, S. J. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundRisk stratification of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is important for appropriate triage. Diagnostic laboratory tests are an essential part of the work-up and risk stratification of these patients. Using machine learning, the prognostic power and clinical value of these tests can be amplified greatly. In this study, we applied machine learning to develop an accurate and explainable clinical decision support tool model that predicts the likelihood of 31-day mortality in ED patients (the RISKINDEX). This tool was developed and evaluated in four Dutch hospitals. MethodsMachine learning models included patient characteristics and available laboratory data collected within the first two hours after ED presentation, and were trained using five years of data from consecutive ED patients from the Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (Maastricht), Meander Medical Center (Amersfoort), and Zuyderland (Sittard and Heerlen). A sixth year of data was used to evaluate the models using area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration curves. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm was used to obtain explainable machine learning models. ResultsThe present study included 266,327 patients with 7.1 million laboratory results available. Models show high diagnostic performance with AUROCs of 0.94,0.98,0.88, and 0.90 for Maastricht, Amersfoort, Sittard and Heerlen, respectively. The SHAP algorithm was utilized to visualize patient characteristics and laboratory data patterns that underlie individual RISKINDEX predictions. ConclusionsOur clinical decision support tool has excellent diagnostic performance in predicting 31-day mortality in ED patients. Follow-up studies will assess whether implementation of these algorithm can improve clinically relevant endpoints.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 98%
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 95%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 97%
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 94%
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning 97%
- Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments 96%
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records 96%
- Modeling physician variability to prioritize relevant medical record information 96%
- Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: A case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergency medicine patient wait time multivariable prediction models: a multicentre derivation and validation study 96%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 93%
- Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in Accident and Emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.