Back

Evolutionary analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for its different clades

Pereson, M. J.; Flichman, D.; Martinez, A.; Bare, P.; Garcia, G.; Di Lello, F.

2020-11-25 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.11.24.396671 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 has become the main target for antiviral and vaccine development. Despite its relevance, there is scarce information about its evolutionary traces. The aim of this study was to investigate the diversification patterns of the spike for each clade of SARS-CoV-2 through different approaches. MethodsTwo thousand and one hundred sequences representing the seven clades of the SARS-CoV-2 were included. Patterns of genetic diversifications and nucleotide evolutionary rate were estimated for the spike genomic region. ResultsThe haplotype networks showed a star shape, where multiple haplotypes with few nucleotide differences diverge from a common ancestor. Four hundred seventy nine different haplotypes were defined in the seven analyzed clades. The main haplotype, named Hap-1, was the most frequent for clades G (54%), GH (54%), and GR (56%) and a different haplotype (named Hap-252) was the most important for clades L (63.3%), O (39.7%), S (51.7%), and V (70%). The evolutionary rate for the spike protein was estimated as 1.08 x 10-3 nucleotide substitutions/site/year. Moreover, the nucleotide evolutionary rate after nine months of pandemic was similar for each clade. ConclusionsIn conclusion, the present evolutionary analysis is relevant since the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is the target for most therapeutic candidates; besides, changes in this protein could have consequences on viral transmission, response to antivirals and efficacy of vaccines. Moreover, the evolutionary characterization of clades improves knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 and deserves to be assessed in more detail since re-infection by different phylogenetic clades has been reported.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.