Memory Transfer of Random Time Patterns Across Modalities
Kang, H.; Auksztulewicz, R.; Chan, C. H.; Cappotto, D.; Rajendran, V. G.; Schnupp, J. W. H.
Show abstract
Perception is sensitive to statistical regularities in the environment, including temporal characteristics of sensory inputs. Interestingly, temporal patterns implicitly learned within one modality can also be recognised in another modality. However, it is unclear how cross-modal learning transfer affects neural responses to sensory stimuli. Here, we recorded neural activity of human volunteers (N=24, 12 females, 12 males) using electroencephalography (EEG), while participants were exposed to brief sequences of randomly-timed auditory or visual pulses. Some trials consisted of a repetition of the temporal pattern within the sequence, and subjects were tasked with detecting these trials. Unknown to the participants, some trials reappeared throughout the experiment, enabling implicit learning. Replicating previous behavioural findings, we showed that participants benefit from temporal information learned in audition, and that they can apply this information to stimuli presented in vision. Such memory transfer was not observed from vision to audition. However, using an analysis of EEG response learning curves, we showed that learning temporal structures both within and across modalities modulates single-trial EEG response amplitudes in both conditions (audition to vision and vision to audition). Interestingly, the neural correlates of temporal learning within modalities relied on modality-specific brain regions, while learning transfer affected activity in frontal regions, suggesting distinct mechanisms. The cross-modal effect could be linked to frontal beta-band activity. The neural effects of learning transfer were similar both when temporal information learned in audition was transferred to visual stimuli and vice versa. Thus, both modality-specific mechanisms for learning of temporal information, and general mechanisms which mediate learning transfer across modalities, have distinct physiological signatures that are observable in the EEG.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Alpha Activity Reflects the Magnitude of an Individual Bias in Human Perception 97%
- Isolating neural signatures of conscious speech perception with a no-report sine-wave speechparadigm 97%
- Neural alpha oscillations and pupil size differentially index cognitive demand under competing audio-visual task conditions 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Expectations boost the reconstruction of auditory features from electrophysiological responses to noisy speech 97%
- Unexpected sounds non-selectively inhibit active visual stimulus representations 97%
- Frontal theta synchronization facilitates the updating of statistical regularities, evidenced by predictive eye movements 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness 97%
- Neural mechanisms underlying expectation-dependent inhibition of distracting information 96%
- Local cortical desynchronization and pupil-linked arousal differentially shape brain states for optimal sensory performance 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Dynamics Underlying Successful Auditory Short-Term Memory Performance 97%
- Perceptual learning of random acoustic patterns: Impact of temporal regularity and attention 97%
- The Effect of Previously Encountered Sensory Information on Neural Representations of Predictability: Evidence from Human EEG 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.