Prefrontal cortical activity predicts the extra-place field spiking of hippocampal place cells
Yu, J. Y.; Frank, L.
Show abstract
The receptive field of a neuron describes the regions of a stimulus space where the neuron is consistently active. Sparse spiking outside of the receptive field is often considered to be noise, rather than a reflection of information processing. Whether this characterization is accurate remains unclear. We therefore contrasted the sparse, temporally isolated spiking of hippocampal CA1 place cells to the consistent, temporally adjacent spiking seen within their spatial receptive fields ("place fields"). We found that isolated spikes, which occur during locomotion, are more strongly phase coupled to hippocampal theta oscillations than adjacent spikes and, surprisingly, transiently express coherent representations of non-local spatial representations. Further, prefrontal cortical activity is coordinated with, and can predict the occurrence of future isolated spiking events. Rather than local noise within the hippocampus, sparse, isolated place cell spiking reflects a coordinated cortical-hippocampal process consistent with the generation of non-local scenario representations during active navigation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Consistent population activity on the scale of minutes in the mouse hippocampus 96%
- Burst activity plays no role for the field-to-field variability and rate remapping of grid cells. 96%
- A configural context signal simultaneously but separably drives positioning and orientation of hippocampal place fields 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Organization and engagement of a prefrontal-olfactory network during olfactory selective attention 95%
- Spatiotemporal dynamics across visual cortical laminae support a predictive coding framework for interpreting mismatch responses 95%
- Oscillation-driven memory encoding, maintenance and recall in an entorhinal-hippocampal circuit model 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.