Back

ThinkCancer! The multi-method development of a complex behaviour change intervention to improve the early diagnosis of cancer in primary care

Surgey, A. W.; Disbeschl, S.; Lewis, R.; Hiscock, J.; Nafees, S.; Law, R.-J.; Roberts, J. L.; Hendry, A.; Hoare, Z.; Goulden, N.; Stanciu, M. A.; Carson-Stevens, A.; Smits, S.; Brain, K. E.; Edwards, R. T.; Williams, N. H.; Neal, R. D.; Wilkinson, C.

2020-11-23 primary care research
10.1101/2020.11.20.20235614 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRelatively poor UK cancer outcomes are blamed upon late diagnosis. Despite most cancer patients presenting to their GP with symptoms, diagnostic delay remains a common theme, with many clinical and non-clinical factors responsible. Early diagnosis is key to improving outcomes and survival. This paper reports the multi-method process to design a complex intervention to improve the timely diagnosis of symptomatic cancer. MethodsA review of reviews, survey, discrete choice experiment, qualitative interviews and focus groups, all informed a realist evidence synthesis. This in turn informed the design of a complex intervention, guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel framework using a multi-step process. ResultsKey themes from the realist evidence synthesis included effective safety netting at practitioner and practice system level, increased vigilance and lowering referral thresholds. Qualitative findings explored the tensions, barriers and facilitators affecting suspected cancer referral. The Think Cancer! intervention is an educational and quality improvement workshop directed at the whole primary care team. Bespoke cancer safety netting plans and appointment of cancer champions are key components. ConclusionsThink Cancer! is a novel primary care early cancer diagnosis intervention, requiring evaluation through a cluster randomised control trial.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.