Back

Are fleas highly modified Mecoptera? Phylogenomic resolution of Antliophora (Insecta: Holometabola)

Meusemann, K.; Trautwein, M.; Friedrich, F.; Beutel, R.; Wiegmann, B. M.; Donath, A.; Podsiadlowski, L.; Petersen, M.; Niehuis, O.; Mayer, C.; Bayless, K.; Shin, S.; Liu, S.; Hlinka, O.; Minh, B. Q.; Kozlov, A. M.; Morel, B.; Peters, R.; Bartel, D.; Grove, S.; Zhou, X.; Misof, B.; Yeates, D.

2020-11-20 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.11.19.390666 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Insect orders have been defined and stable for decades, with few notable exceptions (e.g., Blattodea and Psocoptera). One of the few remaining questions of order-level monophyly is that of Mecoptera in respect to the phylogenetic placement of Siphonaptera (fleas). We used a large set of transcriptomic nucleotide sequence data representing 56 species and more than 3,000 single-copy genes to resolve the evolutionary history of Antliophora, including fleas (Siphonaptera), scorpionflies and relatives (Mecoptera), and true flies (Diptera). We find that fleas and mecopterans together are the sister group of flies. However, our data and/or analyses are unable to distinguish whether fleas are sister to a monophyletic Mecoptera, or whether they arose from within extant mecopteran families, rendering Mecoptera paraphyletic. We did not detect parameter bias in our dataset after applying a broad range of detection methods. Counter to a previous hypothesis that placed fleas within Mecoptera as the sister group to wingless boreids (snow fleas), we found a potential sister group relationship between fleas and the enigmatic family Nannochoristidae. Although we lack conclusive evidence, it seems possible that fleas represent the most-species rich group of modern mecopterans and that their parasitic lifestyle and morphological adaptations have simply made them unrecognizable in respect to their order-level classification.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.2%
2
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
4
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.6%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
6
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
7
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
8
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
9
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
11
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
12
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
14
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
16
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
20
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Biological Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%