Back

Statistical techniques to estimate the SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rate

Mieskolainen, M.; Bainbridge, R.; Buchmueller, O.; Lyons, L.; Wardle, N.

2020-11-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.11.19.20235036 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThe determination of the infection fatality rate (IFR) for the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is a key aim for many of the field studies that are currently being undertaken in response to the pandemic. The IFR together with the basic reproduction number R0, are the main epidemic parameters describing severity and transmissibility of the virus, respectively. The IFR can be also used as a basis for estimating and monitoring the number of infected individuals in a population, which may be subsequently used to inform policy decisions relating to public health interventions and lockdown strategies. The interpretation of IFR measurements requires the calculation of confidence intervals. We present a number of statistical methods that are relevant in this context and develop an inverse problem formulation to determine correction factors to mitigate time-dependent effects that can lead to biased IFR estimates. We also review a number of methods to combine IFR estimates from multiple independent studies, provide example calculations throughout this note and conclude with a summary and "best practice" recommendations. The developed code is available online.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
5
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
7
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
9
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
10
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
11
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
16
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
17
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
19
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
24
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
26
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%