Back

Fighting COVID-19 with Flexible Testing: Models and Insights

Yu, J.; Shen, Z.-J. M.

2020-11-18 public and global health
10.1101/2020.11.17.20233577 medRxiv
Show abstract

Increasing testing capacities plays a substantial role in safely reopening the economy and avoiding a new wave of COVID-19. Pooled testing can expand testing capabilities by pooling multiple individual samples, but it also raises accuracy concerns. In this study, we propose a flexible testing strategy that adopts pooled testing or individual testing according to epidemic dynamics. We identify the prevalence threshold between individual and pooled testing by modeling the expected number of tests per confirmed case. Incorporating an epidemic model, we show pooled testing is more effective in containing epidemic outbreaks and can generate more reliable test results than individual testing because the reliability of test results is relevant to both testing methods and prevalence. Our study is the first to evaluate the interplay between pooled testing and a rapidly evolving outbreak to the best of our knowledge. Our results allay accuracy concerns about pooled testing and provide theoretical supports to empirical studies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.