Selection for Decreased BRCA2 Functional Activity in Homo sapiens After Divergence from the Chimpanzee-Human Last Common Ancestor
Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A.; Huang, J.; Zhong, Y.; Makohon-Moore, A. P.; White, T.; Jasin, M.; Norell, M. A.; Wheeler, W. C.
Show abstract
Humans have an increased incidence of epithelial neoplasia compared to non-human primates. We performed a comparative analysis of 21 non-human primate genomes and 54 ancient human genomes to identify variations in known cancer genes that may explain this difference. We identified 299 human-specific fixed non-silent single nucleotide polymorphisms. Bioinformatics analyses for functional consequences identified a number of variants predicted to have altered protein function, one of which was located at the most evolutionarily conserved domain of human BRCA2. This variant, in which a polar threonine residue replaces a hydrophobic methionine residue to codon 2662 within the DSS1 binding domain, decreases the interactions of BRCA2 with other proteins, specifically the binding of BRCA2 and RAD51, as well as the repairing ability of cells for DNA double-strand breaks. We conclude that a 20% reduction in BRCA2 DNA repair ability was positively selected for in the course of human evolution. One Sentence SummaryReduction of BRCA2 functional activity has been selected for during human evolution since the chimpanzee-human last common ancestor.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- DMC1 and RAD51 bind FxxA and FxPP motifs of BRCA2 via two separate interfaces 95%
- Graph pangenome reveals functional, evolutionary, and phenotypic significance of human nonreference sequences 95%
- SETDB1 Fuels the Lung Cancer Phenotype by Modulating Epigenome, 3D Genome Organization and Chromatin Mechanical Properties 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.