Back

Molecular evidence indicates the existence of multiple lineages of Sperata species in Indian Rivers

Yadav, P.; Kumar, A.; Yadav, N.; Bist, M.; Hussain, S. A.; GUPTA, S. K.

2020-11-17 genetics
10.1101/2020.11.16.377507 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sperata seenghala (Giant river-catfish) and Sperata aor (Long-whiskered catfish) are commercially important freshwater catfishes of India, belongs to family Bagridae. Due to high nutritional significance and the low number of intramuscular bones, both fishes have considerable demand in South Asian countries. Both of the Sperata species are morphologically close and well adapted to the same habitat. In this study, we have assessed the level of genetic diversity and differentiation of S. seenghala and S. aor in the Ganga River based on the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region and compared with the other major Indian rivers. We found high haplotypes diversity for both the species in the Ganga. However, it was comparatively low for S. seenghala in Mahanadi and Brahmaputra populations. The phylogenetic and median-joining network strongly indicated the presence of two distinct maternal lineages of S. seenghala from the Ganga river. Interestingly, the genetic differentiation between S. seenghala of Ganga-Brahmaputra was much higher (~25.3%) than the S. seenghala and S. aor (~17%), whereas it was comparatively low between Ganges-Mahanadi (~8.0%). Our finding provided evidence that all the three rivers: Ganga, Mahanadi, and the Brahmaputra sustain a highly diverse and genetically distinct stock of giant river catfish; therefore, all populations should be considered as a different management unit for the protection of stocks. Our findings indicated that Brahmaputra lineages qualify the species level variations. This study can be further used as a reference database for proper lineage identification of S. seenghala and S. aor that could formulate the appropriate conservation and management plans.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 3%
36.9%
2
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.0%
4
Hydrobiologia
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Molecular Biology Reports
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Aquaculture
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
12
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
15
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
Primates
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
22
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%