Rare Non-coding Variation Identified by Large Scale Whole Genome Sequencing Reveals Unexplained Heritability of Type 2 Diabetes: Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Program
Wessel, J.; Majarian, T. D.; Highland, H. M.; Raghavan, S.; Szeto, M. D.; Hasbani, N. R.; de Vries, P. S.; Brody, J. A.; Sarnowski, C.; DiCorpo, D.; Yin, X.; Hidalgo, B.; Guo, X.; Perry, J.; O'Connell, J. R.; Lent, S.; Montasser, M. E.; Cade, B. E.; Jain, D.; Wang, H.; Wu, P.; Bonas-Guarch, S.; D'Oliveira Albanus, R.; Leong, A.; Miguel-Escalada, I.; Varshney, A.; NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium, ; TOPMed Anthropometry, ; DIAMANTE, ; Kinney, G. L.; Yanek, L. R.; Lange, L.; Almeida, M.; Peralta, J.; Aslibekyan, S.; Baldridge, A. S.; Bertoni, A. G.; Bielak, L. F.;
Show abstract
Type 2 diabetes is increasing in all ancestry groups1. Part of its genetic basis may reside among the rare (minor allele frequency <0.1%) variants that make up the vast majority of human genetic variation2. We analyzed high-coverage (mean depth 38.2x) whole genome sequencing from 9,639 individuals with T2D and 34,994 controls in the NHLBIs Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program2 to show that rare, non-coding variants that are poorly captured by genotyping arrays or imputation panels contribute h2=53% (P=4.2x10-5) to the genetic component of risk in the largest (European) ancestry subset. We coupled sequence variation with islet epigenomic signatures3 to annotate and group rare variants with respect to gene expression4, chromatin state5 and three-dimensional chromatin architecture6, and show that pancreatic islet regulatory elements contribute to T2D genetic risk (h2=8%, P=2.4x10-3). We used islet annotation to create a non-coding framework for rare variant aggregation testing. This approach identified five loci containing rare alleles in islet regulatory elements that suggest novel biological mechanisms readily linked to hypotheses about variant-to-function. Large scale whole genome sequence analysis reveals the substantial contribution of rare, non-coding variation to the genetic architecture of T2D and highlights the value of tissue-specific regulatory annotation for variant-to-function discovery.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rare variant association analysis in 51,256 type 2 diabetes cases and 370,487 controls informs the spectrum of pathogenicity of monogenic diabetes genes 97%
- Fine-mapping, trans-ancestral and genomic analyses identify causal variants, cells, genes and drug targets for type 1 diabetes 97%
- A combined polygenic score of 21,293 rare and 22 common variants significantly improves diabetes diagnosis based on hemoglobin A1C levels 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis Of Body Mass Index Identifies Novel African Ancestry-Specific Risk Allele 95%
- Rare variant associations with birth weight identify genes involved in adipose tissue regulation, placental function and insulin-like growth factor signalling 95%
- The impact of non-additive genetic associations on age-related complex diseases. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis across Taiwan Biobank, Biobank Japan and UK Biobank identifies hundreds of novel loci for 36 quantitative traits 96%
- Identification of novel type 1 and type 2 diabetes genes by co-localization of human islet eQTL and GWAS variants with colocRedRibbon 95%
- Type 1 diabetes risk genes mediate pancreatic beta cell survival in response to proinflammatory cytokines 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of type 2 diabetes loci in 433,540 East Asian individuals 97%
- Parent-of-Origin inference and its role in the genetic architecture of complex traits: evidence from ~265,000 individuals 96%
- Large-scale genetic association and single cell accessible chromatin mapping defines cell type-specific mechanisms of type 1 diabetes risk 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.