Back

Efficient transcriptome profiling across the malaria parasite erythrocytic cycle by flow sorting

Dia, A.; Jett, C.; McDew-White, M.; Li, X.; Anderson, T.; Cheeseman, I. H.

2020-11-10 genomics
10.1101/2020.11.10.377168 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plasmodium falciparum is the most virulent and widespread of the human malaria parasite species. This parasite has a complex life cycle that involves sexual replication in a mosquito vector and asexual replication in a human host. During the 48-hour intraerythrocytic developmental cycle (IDC), parasites develop and multiply through the morphologically distinct ring, trophozoite and schizont stages. Stage-specific transcriptomic approaches have shown gene expression profiles continually change throughout the IDC. Cultures of tightly synchronized parasites are required to capture the transcriptome specific to a developmental stage. However, the most commonly used synchronization methods require lysis of late stages, potentially perturbing transcription, and often do not result in tightly synchronized cultures. To produce complete transcriptome profiles of the IDC a synchronous culture requires frequent sampling over a 48-hour period, this is both time consuming and labor intensive. Here we develop a method to sample the IDC densely by isolating parasites from an asynchronous culture with fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). We sort parasites in tight windows of IDC progression based on their DNA/RNA abundance. We confirmed the tight synchronization and stage specificity by light microscopy and RNAseq profiling. We optimized our protocol for low numbers of sorted cells allowing us to rapidly capture transcriptome profiles across the entire IDC from a single culture flask. This methodology will allow malaria stage-specific studies to perform experiments directly from asynchronous cultures with high accuracy and without the need for labor-intensive time-course experiments.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.