Neural network fast-classifies biological images using features selected after their random-forests-importance to power smart microscopy.
Balluet, M.; Sizaire, F.; Walter, T.; Pont, J.; Giroux, B.; Bouchareb, O.; Tramier, M.; Pecreaux, J.
Show abstract
Artificial intelligence is nowadays used for cell detection and classification in optical microscopy, during post-acquisition analysis. The microscopes are now fully automated and next expected to be smart, to make acquisition decisions based on the images. It calls for analysing them on the fly. Biology further imposes training on a reduced dataset due to cost and time to prepare the samples and have the datasets annotated by experts. We propose here a real-time image processing, compliant with these specifications by balancing accurate detection and execution performance. We characterised the images using a generic, high-dimensional feature extractor. We then classified the images using machine learning for the sake of understanding the contribution of each feature in decision and execution time. We found that the non-linear-classifier random forests outperformed Fishers linear discriminant. More importantly, the most discriminant and time-consuming features could be excluded without any significant loss in accuracy, offering a substantial gain in execution time. It suggests a feature-group redundancy likely related to the biology of the observed cells. We offer a method to select fast and discriminant features. In our assay, a 79.6 {+/-} 2.4 % accurate classification of a cell took 68.7 {+/-} 3.5 ms (mean {+/-} SD, 5-fold cross-validation nested in 10 bootstrap repeats), corresponding to 14 cells per second, dispatched into 8 phases of the cell cycle using 12 feature-groups and operating a consumer market ARM-based embedded system. Interestingly, a simple neural network offered similar performances paving the way to faster training and classification, using parallel execution on a general-purpose graphic processing unit. Finally, this strategy is also usable for deep neural networks paving the way to optimising these algorithms for smart microscopy.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spherical harmonics texture extraction for versatile analysis of biological objects 95%
- DeLTA: Automated cell segmentation, tracking, and lineage reconstruction using deep learning 95%
- Deep learning tools and modeling to estimate the temporal expression of cell cycle proteins from 2D still images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Highly-Efficient, Scalable Pipeline for Fixed Feature Extraction from Large-Scale High-Content Imaging Screens 93%
- Enhanced Cell Tracking Using A GAN-based Super-Resolution Video-to-Video Time-Lapse Microscopy Generative Model 93%
- Label-free Cell Tracking Enables Collective Motion Phenotyping in Epithelial Monolayers 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.