Back

Diverse chemotypes drive biased signaling by cannabinoid receptors

Miljus, T.; Heydenreich, F. M.; Gazzi, T.; Kimbara, A.; Rogers-Evans, M.; Nettekoven, M.; Zirwes, E.; Osterwald, A.; Rufer, A. C.; Ullmer, C.; Guba, W.; Le Gouill, C.; Fingerle, J.; Nazare, M.; Grether, U.; Bouvier, M.; Veprintsev, D. B.

2020-11-10 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2020.11.09.375162 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors are members of the G protein-coupled receptor family, which is the largest class of membrane proteins in the human genome. As part of the endocannabinoid system, they have many regulatory functions in the human body. Their malfunction therefore triggers a diverse set of undesired conditions, such as pain, neuropathy, nephropathy, pruritus, osteoporosis, cachexia and Alzheimers disease. Although drugs targeting the system exist, the molecular and functional mechanisms involved are still poorly understood, preventing the development of better therapeutics with fewer undesired effects. One path toward the development of better and safer medicines targeting cannabinoid receptors relies on the ability of some compounds to activate a subset of pathways engaged by the receptor while sparing or even inhibiting the others, a phenomenon known as biased signaling. To take advantage of this phenomenon for drug development, a better profiling of the pathways engaged by the receptors is required. Using a BRET-based signaling detection platform, we systematically analyzed the primary signaling cascades activated by CB1 and CB2 receptors, including 9 G protein and 2 {beta}-arrestin subtypes. Given that biased signaling is driven by ligand-specific distinct active conformations of the receptor, establishing a link between the signaling profiles elicited by different drugs and their chemotypes may help designing compounds that selectively activate beneficial pathways while avoiding those leading to undesired effects. We screened a selection of 35 structurally diverse ligands, including endocannabinoids, phytocannabinoids and synthetic compounds structurally similar or significantly different from natural cannabinoids. Our data show that biased signaling is a prominent feature of the cannabinoid receptor system and that, as predicted, ligands with different chemotypes have distinct signaling profiles. The study therefore allows for better understanding of cannabinoid receptors signaling and provides the information about tool compounds that can now be used to link signaling pathways to biological outcomes, aiding the design of improved therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.8%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
8
Molecular Pharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
12
Biochemical Pharmacology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
13
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
17
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
19
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
28
Genes to Cells
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%