Testing the masculinization hypothesis in a sample of 23,935 human brains
Alon, N.; Meilijson, I.; Joel, D.
Show abstract
The authors have withdrawn their manuscript because in revising it following a Reviewers comment, they realized the data no longer suit one of their requirements. Specifically, the Reviewer noted that they had a mistake in their code for correction for brain size. Following this correction, the authors realized that most of the corrected measures do not fit a Gaussian distribution, thereby rendering their approach mathematically unjustified. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Shared functional connections within and between cortical networks predict individual cognitive abilities in males and females 95%
- Every individual makes a difference: A trinity derived from linking individual brain morphometry, connectivity and mentalising ability 94%
- A comparison of intracranial volume estimation methods and their cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with age 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Grey and white matter metrics demonstrate distinct and complementary prediction of differences in cognitive performance in children: Findings from ABCD (N= 11 876) 94%
- Multimodal imaging brain markers in early adolescence are linked with a physically active lifestyle 93%
- Hemispheric asymmetry of globus pallidus relates to alpha modulation in reward-related attentional tasks 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.