Back

Costly induction of defense reduces plant growth and alters reproductive traits in mixed-mating Datura stramonium

Jacobsen, D. J.

2020-11-08 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.11.06.371989 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Herbivory shapes plant trait evolution by altering allocation to growth and defense in ways that affect plant reproduction and fitness. Initiation of these trade-offs may be particularly strong in juvenile plants with high phenotypic plasticity. Herbivory costs are often measured in terms of plant size or flower numbers, but other herbivore-induced floral changes can alter interactions with pollinators and have important implications for mating systems. In mixed-mating plants that can both self-fertilize and outcross, herbivory can maintain mating system variation if herbivore damage and defensive induction change a plants likelihood of selfing versus outcrossing. Here, I use mixed-mating Datura stramonium to evaluate how early defensive induction and herbivory result in trade-offs among plant defense, growth and reproduction. I used a 2x2 factorial manipulation of early chemical defense induction and season-long insecticide in the field. Growth costs of chemical induction were seen even before plants received damage, indicating an inherent cost of defense. Induction and herbivory changed multiple aspects of floral biology associated with a plants selfing or outcrossing rate. This including reduced floral allocation, earlier flowering, and reduced anther-stigma separation (herkogamy). Although these floral changes are associated with decreased attractiveness to pollinators, plants exposed to natural herbivory did not have decreased seed set. This is likely because their floral morphologies became more conducive to selfing (via reduced herkogamy). These vegetative and floral changes following damage and defensive induction can impact interactions among plants (by altering mating environment) and interactions with pollinators (via changes in floral allocation and floral phenology).

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
3
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.5%
6
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
8
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
13
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
14
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
15
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
16
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
19
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
25
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%