Back

Reciprocal social ties drive stable cooperation within a social network

Dakin, R.; Clunis, P.; Ryder, T. B.

2020-11-07 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2020.11.06.371567 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Social reciprocity is thought to be the most important driver of cooperation among non-kin, but its effects within complex social networks where individuals choose their partners have not been studied. Here, we test whether reciprocation can explain social dynamics in a bird species where males form coalitions to court females, the wire-tailed manakin (Pipra filicauda). In our study population, approximately a third of male-male social interactions involve one male leaving his territory to interact and display with the owner of another territory; this directional behaviour provides benefits to the recipient at a cost to the visiting male. We characterize social ties among pairs of territory holders according to the directionality of their interactions, and show here that territory holding males engaged in far more reciprocated (bidirectional) partnerships with other territory holders than expected by chance. Reciprocated partnerships were also stronger (i.e., the partners interacted more frequently) than non-reciprocated partnerships, controlling for spatial proximity of the territories. An individual-level analysis revealed that a males social contribution to a given partner was predictive of the number of social interactions he received from that same partner. Finally, we show that reciprocation predicted the long-term stability of social partnerships one year later. Together, these results demonstrate that reciprocity is associated with stability in complex social networks where partner choice is flexible. LAY SUMMARYO_ST_ABSWhen animals are free to choose their partners, how does reciprocity influence social dynamics?C_ST_ABSIn the wire-tailed manakin, males form coalitions with other males to help attract mates. We tracked male social networks and found that some males form reciprocal partnerships where each male leaves its territory to display at the others territory. These bidirectional partnerships are particularly strong and stable, indicating that reciprocity is associated with stability in complex social networks.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
5
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
6
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
7
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
8
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
11
Ethology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.5%
15
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
17
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
22
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%