Back

Pro chondrogenic effect of mesenchymal stromal cell-based treatment of chondral defects under physioxia in a novel ex vivo organ mode

Schwab, A.; Buss, A.; Pullig, O.; Ehlicke, F.

2020-11-08 cell biology
10.1101/2020.11.06.348177 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveCartilage defect treatment strategies are dependent on the lesion size and severity. Osteochondral explants models are a platform to test cartilage repair strategies ex vivo. Current models lack in mimicking the variety of clinically relevant defect scenarios. In this controlled laboratory study, an automated device (artificial tissue cutter, ARTcut(R)) was implemented to reproducible create cartilage defects with controlled depth. In a pilot study, the effect of cartilage defect depth and oxygen tension on cartilage repair was investigated. DesignOsteochondral explants were isolated from porcine condyles. 4 mm chondral and full thickness defects were treated with either porcine chondrocytes (CHON) or co-culture of 20 % CHON and 80 % MSC (MIX) embedded in collagen hydrogel. Explants were cultured with tissue specific media (without TGF-{beta}) under normoxia (20 % O2) and physiological hypoxia (2 % O2). After 28 days, immune-histological stainings (Collagen II and X, Aggrecan) were scored (modified Bern-score, 3 independent scorer) to quantitatively compare treatments outcome. ResultsARTcut(R) represents a software-controlled device for creation of uniform cartilage defects. Comparing the scoring results of the MIX and the CHON treatment, a positive relation between oxygen tension and defect depth was observed. Low oxygen tension stimulated cartilaginous matrix deposition in MIX group in chondral defects and CHON treatment in full thickness defects. ConclusionARTcut(R) has proved a powerful tool to create cartilage defects and thus opens a wide range of novel applications of the osteochondral model, including the relation between oxygen tension and defect depth on cartilage repair.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.