Interrogation of SLFN11 in pediatric sarcomas uncovers an unexpected biological role and a novel therapeutic approach to overcoming resistance to replicative stress
Gartrell, J.; Mellado-Lagarde, M.; Martinez, N.; Clay, M.; Bahrami, A.; Sahr, N.; Sykes, A.; Blankenship, K.; Hoffmann, L.; Xie, J.; Cho, H. P.; Twarog, N.; Connelly, M.; Yan, K.-K.; Yu, J.; Porter, S. N.; Pruett-Miller, S. M.; Neale, G.; Tinkle, C.; Federico, S.; Stewart, E.; Shelat, A.
Show abstract
Pediatric sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies that exhibit variable response to DNA damaging chemotherapy. Schlafen family member 11 protein (SLFN11) increases sensitivity to replicative stress, and SLFN11 gene silencing has been implicated as a common mechanism of drug resistance in tumors in adults. We found SLFN11 to be widely expressed in our cohort of pediatric sarcomas. In sarcoma cell lines, protein expression strongly correlated with response to the PARP inhibitor talazoparib (TAL) and the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (IRN), with SLFN11 knockout resulting in significant loss of sensitivity in vitro and in vivo. However, SLFN11 expression was not associated with favorable outcomes in a retrospective analysis of our patient cohort; instead, the protein was retained and promoted tumor growth and evasion. Furthermore, we show that pediatric sarcomas develop resistance to TAL and IRN through impaired intrinsic apoptosis, and that resistance can be reversed by selective inhibition of BCL-XL. Statement of SignificanceThe role of SLFN11 in pediatric sarcomas has not been thoroughly explored. In contrast to its activity in adult tumors, SLFN11 did not predict favorable outcomes in pediatric patients, was not silenced, and promoted tumor growth. Resistance to replicative stress in SLFN11-expressing sarcomas was reversed by selective inhibition of BCL-XL.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multidimensional Characterization of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas with FUS-TFCP2 or EWSR1-TFCP2 Fusions 96%
- Clinical sequencing of soft tissue and bone sarcomas delineates diverse genomic landscapes and potential therapeutic targets 94%
- Single cell transcriptomic profiling identifies tumor-acquired and therapy-resistant cell states in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinically-relevant treatment of PDX models reveals patterns of neuroblastoma chemoresistance 95%
- CDK4/6 inhibition enhances SHP2 inhibitor efficacy and is dependent upon restoration of RB function in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors 94%
- Autocrine TGFβ2 enforces a transcriptionally hybrid cell state in Ewing sarcoma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Endoglin, a novel biomarker and therapeutical target to prevent malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor growth and metastasis 94%
- Elucidating the heterogeneity of immunotherapy response and immune-related toxicities by longitudinal ctDNA and immune cell compartment tracking in lung cancer 94%
- Acquired FGFR and FGF alterations confer resistance to estrogen receptor (ER) targeted therapy in ER+ metastatic breast cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acquired RAD51C promoter methylation loss causes PARP inhibitor resistance in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma 94%
- PAX3-FOXO1 drives targetable cell state-dependent metabolic vulnerabilities in rhabdomyosarcoma 94%
- A targetable PREX2/RAC1/PI3Kβ signalling axis confers resistance to clinically relevant therapeutic approaches in melanoma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Splicing modulators impair DNA damage response and induce killing of cohesin-mutant MDS/AML 94%
- BLM overexpression as a predictive biomarker for CHK1 inhibitor response in PARP inhibitor–resistant BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer 94%
- ALT Neuroblastoma Chemoresistance due to ATM Activation by Telomere Dysfunction is Reversible with the ATM Inhibitor AZD0156 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.