Back

Interrogation of SLFN11 in pediatric sarcomas uncovers an unexpected biological role and a novel therapeutic approach to overcoming resistance to replicative stress

Gartrell, J.; Mellado-Lagarde, M.; Martinez, N.; Clay, M.; Bahrami, A.; Sahr, N.; Sykes, A.; Blankenship, K.; Hoffmann, L.; Xie, J.; Cho, H. P.; Twarog, N.; Connelly, M.; Yan, K.-K.; Yu, J.; Porter, S. N.; Pruett-Miller, S. M.; Neale, G.; Tinkle, C.; Federico, S.; Stewart, E.; Shelat, A.

2020-11-05 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.11.05.370155 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pediatric sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies that exhibit variable response to DNA damaging chemotherapy. Schlafen family member 11 protein (SLFN11) increases sensitivity to replicative stress, and SLFN11 gene silencing has been implicated as a common mechanism of drug resistance in tumors in adults. We found SLFN11 to be widely expressed in our cohort of pediatric sarcomas. In sarcoma cell lines, protein expression strongly correlated with response to the PARP inhibitor talazoparib (TAL) and the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (IRN), with SLFN11 knockout resulting in significant loss of sensitivity in vitro and in vivo. However, SLFN11 expression was not associated with favorable outcomes in a retrospective analysis of our patient cohort; instead, the protein was retained and promoted tumor growth and evasion. Furthermore, we show that pediatric sarcomas develop resistance to TAL and IRN through impaired intrinsic apoptosis, and that resistance can be reversed by selective inhibition of BCL-XL. Statement of SignificanceThe role of SLFN11 in pediatric sarcomas has not been thoroughly explored. In contrast to its activity in adult tumors, SLFN11 did not predict favorable outcomes in pediatric patients, was not silenced, and promoted tumor growth. Resistance to replicative stress in SLFN11-expressing sarcomas was reversed by selective inhibition of BCL-XL.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.