Back

A lateral flow test detecting SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies

Wang, J. J.; Zhang, N.; Chen, S.; Wu, J. V.; Yang, X.

2020-11-10 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.11.05.20222596 medRxiv
Show abstract

It is of critical importance for COVID-19 survivors, vaccine recipients, and public to know whether they have developed neutralizing antibodies or immunity. Here, we describe a 15 minutes lateral flow test for rapid detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. All other currently available neutralization tests require hours or days to complete and have to be performed in a well-equipped laboratory. This lateral flow test is the first of its kind and will serve as a convenient diagnostic tool in management of COVID-19 disease.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eBioMedicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.5%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Clinical Chemistry
◐ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Journal of Medical Virology
○ 140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.5%
7
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
● 130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
8
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.4%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
○ 638 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
10
Journal of Clinical Virology
○ 63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Med
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
○ 129 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Diagnostics
○ 50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
○ 120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
○ 153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
19
Communications Medicine
○ 113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
21
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
22
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
23
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
24
Transfusion
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
Clinical Infectious Diseases
◐ 235 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Analytical Chemistry
● 218 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Lab on a Chip
● 96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Journal of Virological Methods
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Viruses
○ 332 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.