Landmark-Centered Coding in Frontal Cortex Visual Responses
Schuetz, A.; Bharmauria, V.; Yan, X.; Wang, H.; Bremmer, F.; Crawford, J. D.
Show abstract
Visual landmarks influence spatial cognition [1-3], navigation [4,5] and goal-directed behavior [6-8], but their influence on visual coding in sensorimotor systems is poorly understood [6,9-11]. We hypothesized that visual responses in frontal cortex control gaze areas encode potential targets in an intermediate gaze-centered / landmark-centered reference frame that might depend on specific target-landmark configurations rather than a global mechanism. We tested this hypothesis by recording neural activity in the frontal eye fields (FEF) and supplementary eye fields (SEF) while head-unrestrained macaques engaged in a memory-delay gaze task. Visual response fields (the area of visual space where targets modulate activity) were tested for each neuron in the presence of a background landmark placed at one of four oblique configurations relative to the target stimulus. 102 of 312 FEF and 43 of 256 SEF neurons showed spatially tuned response fields in this task. We then fit these data against a mathematical continuum between a gaze-centered model and a landmark-centered model. When we pooled data across the entire dataset for each neuron, our response field fits did not deviate significantly from the gaze-centered model. However, when we fit response fields separately for each target-landmark configuration, the best fits shifted (mean 37% / 40%) toward landmark-centered coding in FEF / SEF respectively. This confirmed an intermediate gaze / landmark-centered mechanism dependent on local (configuration-dependent) interactions. Overall, these data show that external landmarks influence prefrontal visual responses, likely helping to stabilize gaze goals in the presence of variable eye and head orientations. HighlightsO_LIPrefrontal visual responses recorded in the presence of visual landmarks C_LIO_LIResponse fields showed intermediate gaze / landmark-centered organization C_LIO_LIThis influence depended on specific target-landmark configurations C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-preferred contrast responses in the Drosophila motion pathways reveal a receptive field structure that explains a common visual illusion 96%
- State and stimulus dependence reconcile motion computation and the Drosophila connectome 95%
- Look-up and look-down neurons in the mouse visual thalamus during freely moving exploration 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.