Frequent testing and immunity-based staffing will help mitigate outbreaks in nursing home settings
Holmdahl, I.; Kahn, R.; Hay, J.; Buckee, C. O.; Mina, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundNursing homes and other long term care facilities have been disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies are urgently needed to reduce transmission in these vulnerable populations. We aim to evaluate the reduction in transmission in nursing homes achieved through contact-targeted interventions and testing. MethodsWe developed an agent-based Susceptible-Exposed- Infectious(Asymptomatic/Symptomatic)-Recovered (SEIR) model to examine SARS-CoV-2 transmission in nursing homes. Residents and staff are modelled individually; residents are split into two cohorts based on COVID-19 diagnosis. We evaluate the effectiveness of two contact-targeted interventions. In the resident cohorting intervention, recovered residents are moved back from the COVID (infected) cohort to the non-COVID (susceptible/uninfected) cohort. In the immunity-based staffing intervention, recovered staff, who we assume have protective immunity, are assigned to work in the non-COVID cohort, while susceptible staff work in the COVID cohort and are assumed to have high levels of protection from personal protective equipment. These interventions aim to reduce the fraction of peoples contacts that are presumed susceptible (and therefore potentially infected) and replace them with recovered (immune) contacts. We further evaluate two types of screening tests conducted with varying frequency: 1) rapid antigen testing and 2) PCR testing. ResultsThe frequency and type of testing has a larger impact on the size of outbreaks than the cohorting and staffing interventions. The most effective testing strategy modeled is daily antigen testing. Under all screening testing strategies, the resident cohorting intervention and the immunity-based staffing intervention reduce the final size of the outbreak among residents, with the latter reducing it more. The efficacy of these interventions among staff varies by testing strategy and outbreak size. ConclusionsIncreasing the frequency of screening testing of all residents and staff, or even staff alone, in nursing homes has the potential to greatly reduce outbreaks in this vulnerable setting. Immunity-based staffing can further reduce spread at little or no additional cost and becomes particularly important when daily testing is not feasible.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Epidemiological Implications of Jails for Community, Corrections Officer, and Incarcerated Population Risks from COVID-19 93%
- Understanding the net benefit of antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19: An enhanced decision-curve analysis 91%
- Theoretical framework for retrospective studies of the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mathematical modeling to inform vaccination strategies and testing approaches for COVID-19 in nursing homes 96%
- Modeling effectiveness of testing strategies to prevent COVID-19 in nursing homes —United States, 2020 95%
- Strategies for using antigen rapid diagnostic tests to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in low- and middle-income countries: a mathematical modelling study applied to Zambia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in English care homes: a modelling study 97%
- Testing and Vaccination to Reduce the Impact of COVID-19 in Nursing Homes: An Agent-Based Approach 97%
- Preventing a cluster from becoming a new wave in settings with zero community COVID-19 cases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Infection control strategies in essential industries: using COVID-19 in the food industry to model economic and public health trade-offs 94%
- Continued need for non-pharmaceutical interventions after COVID-19 vaccination in long-term-care facilities 93%
- Modeling the systemic risks of COVID-19 on the wildland firefighting workforce 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.