Back

A Novel Primer Probe Set for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Sensitive Droplet Digital PCR

Wang, F.; Pervaiz, U.; Tian, H.; Gahdary, M. O. A. O. A.; Hamid, M. A. M.; Wang, D.

2020-11-04 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.11.03.20224972 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe current increase in the spread of (SARS-CoV-2) critically needs a multitarget diagnostic assays to promote analytical sensitivity to facilitate the public health actions. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a new primer-probe set targeting N gene of SARS-CoV-2 to improve the sensitivity for detection of COVID-19(Corona Virus Disease 2019)in multiplex rRT-PCR (Reversetranscript Realtime PCR) and ddPCR (Droplet Digital PCR). ResultsWe designed primers/probes set N(LZU3) targeting the N gene of 2019-nCov and proved its sensitivity in both rRT-PCR and ddPCR. When the quantity of template was 105 copies/reaction, the mean Ct value of N(LZU3) was 32.563, the detection rate was 91.7%. If the quantity of template was 52.5 copies/reaction, the mean Ct value of N(LZU3) was 33.835, and the detection rate was 83.3%, which were similar with that of N(CDC) and N(USA). The calculated lower limit of detection (LOD) of the new primer-probe set N(LZU3) used in rRT-PCR was 118 copies/reaction. We also did one-step ddPCR for detection the same serial dilution of RNA template. It shows good linearity for primer/probe sets N(LZU3). The calculated lower limit of detection (LOD) of N(LZU3) was 22.4 copies/reaction, which was 1.12 copies/ul. ConclusionThe novel primer-probe set(LZU3) targeting N gene of SARS-CoV-2 could be both used in rRT-PCR and ddPCR with better sensitivity, furthermore, ddPCR method had higer sensitivity than rRT-PCR, hence it could significantly improve SARS-CoV-2 detection efficiency in low virus load and asymptomatic infection.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
5
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
8
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
9
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
20
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.7%
30
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%