Amplification of frog calls by leaf substrates: implications for terrestrial and arboreal species
Munoz, M. I.; Halfwerk, W.
Show abstract
Signal detection is a minimum requirement for any communicative interaction. Acoustic signals, however, often experience amplitude losses during their transmission through the environment, reducing their detection range. Displaying from sites that increase the amplitude of the sound produced, such as cavities or some reflective surfaces, can improve the detectability of signals by distant receivers. Understanding how display sites influence sound production is, however, far from understood. We measured the effect of leaf calling sites on the calls of an arboreal (Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni) and a leaf-litter specialist (Silverstoneia flotator) frog species. We collected the leaves where males of both species were observed calling, and conducted playback experiments to measure their effect on the amplitude of frog calls. Overall, the leaves used by H. fleischmanni and S. flotator were of similar dimensions, and amplified the calls of each species by about 5.0 and 2.5 dB, respectively. The degree of call amplification was unrelated to leaf dimensions or the position of the frogs on the leaves, but explained by the different frequency content of the calls of each species. Depending on the spatial location of intended and unintended receivers, we suggest that amplification of frog calls by leaves could represent either a benefit or impose costs for arboreal and terrestrial species. We argue that the microhabitat of the substrate from which animals display needs to be considered when addressing signal evolution. Lay summaryAnimals produce signals from specific locations in the environment, yet we know surprisingly little about the effects of the small-scale habitat on animal communication. Here we show that the calls of a terrestrial and an arboreal frog species are amplified by the leaves they use as calling sites. We argue that the consequences of this enhancement need to be considered in relation to the spatial location of intended (males and females) and unintended receivers (predators and parasites).
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Male-male interactions select for conspicuous male colouration in damselflies 94%
- Honestly exaggerated: howler monkey roars are reliable signals of body size and behaviourally relevant to listeners 94%
- Heterospecific song quality as social information for settlement decisions: an experimental approach in a wild bird 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of vibration amplitude in the escape hatching response of red-eyed treefrog embryos 94%
- A kinematic analysis of Micrurus coral snakes reveals unexpected variation in stereotyped anti-predator displays within a mimicry system 94%
- Parallel and divergent morphological adaptations underlying the evolution of jumping ability in ants 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.