Back

Chemical signatures of human odour generate a unique neural code in the brain of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes

Zhao, Z.; Zung, J. L.; Kriete, A. L.; Iqbal, A.; Younger, M. A.; Matthews, B. J.; Merhof, D.; Thiberge, S.; Strauch, M.; McBride, C. S.

2020-11-02 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.11.01.363861 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A globally invasive form of the mosquito Aedes aegypti specializes in biting humans, making it an efficient vector of dengue, yellow fever, Zika, and chikungunya viruses. Host-seeking females strongly prefer human odour over the odour of non-human animals, but exactly how they distinguish the two is not known. Vertebrate odours are complex blends of volatile chemicals with many shared components, making discrimination an interesting sensory coding challenge. Here we show that human and animal odour blends evoke activity in unique combinations of olfactory glomeruli within the Aedes aegypti antennal lobe. Human blends consistently activate a universal glomerulus, which is equally responsive to diverse animal and nectar-related blends, and a more selective human-sensitive glomerulus. This dual signal robustly distinguishes humans from animals across concentrations, individual humans, and diverse animal species. Remarkably, the human-sensitive glomerulus is narrowly tuned to the long-chain aldehydes decanal and undecanal, which we show are consistently enriched in (though not specific to) human odour and which likely originate from unique human skin lipids. We propose a model of host-odour coding wherein normalization of activity in the human-sensitive glomerulus by that in the broadly-tuned universal glomerulus generates a robust discriminatory signal of the relative concentration of long-chain aldehydes in a host odour blend. Our work demonstrates how animal brains may distil complex odour stimuli of innate biological relevance into simple neural codes and reveals novel targets for the design of next-generation mosquito-control strategies.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.