Optimizing training programs for athletic performance: a Monte-Carlo Tree Search variant method
Houy, N.
Show abstract
PurposeUsing a variant of the Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm, we compute optimal personalized and generic training programs for athletic performance. MethodsWe use a non-linear performance model with population variability for athletes and non-athletes previously used in the literature. Then, we simulate an in-silico test population. For each individual of this population, we compute the performance obtained after implementing several widely used training programs as well as the one obtained by our variant of the MCTS algorithm. Two cases are considered depending on individual parameters being observed and personalized programs being possible or only parameter distributions being available and only generic training programs being implementable. ResultsCompared to widely used training programs, our optimization leads to an increase in performance between 1.1 (95% CI: 0.9 - 1.4) percentage point of the performance obtained with stationary optimal training dose (pp POTD) for athletes and unknown individual characteristics to 10.0 (95% CI: 9.6 - 10.3) pp POTD for nonathletes and known individual characteristics. The value of information when using MCTS optimized training strategies, i.e. the difference between the performance that can be reached with knowledge of individual characteristics and the performance that can be reached without it is 14.7 (95% CI: 12.8 - 16.7) pp POTD for athletes and 3.0 (95% CI: 2.6 - 3.4) pp POTD for non-athletes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Hessian-based decomposition characterizes how performance in complex motor skills depends on individual strategy and variability 96%
- Prediction of Covid-19 spreading and optimal coordination of counter-measures: From microscopic to macroscopic models to Pareto fronts 96%
- Screening plans for SARS-CoV-2 based on sampling and rotation: an example in the school setting 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reinforcement learning derived chemotherapeutic schedules for robust patient-specific therapy 96%
- Ranking the Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Counter COVID-19 in UK Universities with Vaccinated Population 95%
- Migrastatic Therapy as a Potential Game-Changer inAdaptive Cancer Treatment 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive modeling of secondary pulmonary hypertension in left ventricular diastolic dysfunction 92%
- Computational reconstruction of clonal hierarchies from bulk sequencing data of acute myeloid leukemia samples 92%
- Discrete dynamic model of the mammalian sperm acrosome reaction: the influence of acrosomal pH and biochemical heterogeneity 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.