Back

European Primary Forest Database (EPFD) v2.0

Sabatini, F. M.; Bluhm, H.; Kun, Z.; Aksenov, D.; Atauri, J. A.; Buchwald, E.; Burrascano, S.; Cateau, E.; Diku, A.; Marques Duarte, I.; Fernandez Lopez, A. B.; Garbarino, M.; Grigoriadis, N.; Horvath, F.; Keren, S.; Kitenberga, M.; Kis, A.; Kraut, A.; Ibisch, P. L.; Larrieu, L.; Lombardi, F.; Matovic, B.; Melu, R. N.; Meyer, P.; Midteng, R.; Mikac, S.; Mikolas, M.; Mozgeris, G.; Panayotov, M.; Pisek, R.; Nunes, L.; Ruete, A.; Schickhofer, M.; Simovski, B.; Stillhard, J.; Stojanovic, D.; Szwagrzyk, J.; Tikkanen, O.-P.; Toromani, E.; Volosyanchuk, R.; Vrska, T.; Waldherr, M.; Yermokhin, M.; Zla

2020-10-30 ecology
10.1101/2020.10.30.362434 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Primary forests are scarce in Europe and continue to disappear at an alarming rate. Despite these losses, we know little about where such forests still occur. Here, we present an updated geodatabase and map of Europes known primary forests. Our geodatabase harmonizes 48 different datasets of primary forests, and contains 18,411 individual patches (41.1 Mha) spread across 33 countries. When available, we provide information on each patch (name, location, naturalness, extent and dominant tree species) and the surrounding landscape (biogeographical regions, protection status, potential natural vegetation, current forest extent). To assess the robustness of our geodatabase, we checked each patch for forest disturbance events using Landsat satellite-image time series (1985-2018). We estimate that 94% of the patches in our database did not experience significant disturbances that would alter their primary forest status in the last 30 year. Our database is the most comprehensive dataset on primary forests in Europe, and will be useful for biogeographic and ecological studies, and conservation planning to safeguard these unique forests.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.