Back

Socioeconomic Vulnerabilities and the Intensity of RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 Testing Efforts in the Public Health System in Sao Paulo State

Sousa, T. C. M. d.; Moreira, N. d. P.; Krieger, J.; Rosa, I. S. C.; Zamudio, M.; Veras, M. A. S. M.; Kemp, B.; Barberia, L.

2020-11-03 public and global health
10.1101/2020.10.29.20221960 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe testing of infected persons with SARS-CoV-2 is one of the cornerstones of an effective strategy deployed for pandemic control. The public health diagnostic effort is particularly important in regions with a critical transmission scenario and in vulnerable populations in these districts, such as Sao Paulo state, the Brazilian epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsWe developed an RT-PCR testing intensity effort index (RT-PCR TIEI) composed of seven indicators to assess the survelliance efforts in the Sao Paulo State. We used dynamic time-series cross-sectional models to analyze the association between the RT-PCR TIEI, the population living under high socioeconomic vulnerability levels, dependent on public health service (SUS), per capita income, and population density. ResultsOn average, the RT-PCR TIEI score was 21.07. In the long-run, the RT-PCR TIEI is negatively associated with socioeconomic vulnerability (p-value=0.000, 95% CI -0.887, - 0.811), with a higher proportion of the population dependent on SUS (p-value= 0.000, 95% CI -0.871, -0.805), per capita income (p-value= 0.000, 95% CI -0.849,-0.792) and with population density (p-value=0.000, 95% CI -0.853; -0.801). ConclusionTesting efforts declined as the pandemic advanced, and the the lowest RT-PCR TIEI values were found in the most socioeconomic vulnerable RHDs. Local public laboratory presence was a predictor of a higher score. Thus, the low testing RT-PCR efforts and local laboratory inequalities affected surveillance capability, especially for socioeconomic vulnerable populations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.