New Genes in Drosophila Quickly Evolved Essential Functions in Viability During Development
Xia, S.; VanKuren, N. W.; Chen, C.; Zhang, L.; Kemkemer, C.; Shao, Y.; Jia, H.; Lee, U.; Advani, A. S.; Gschwend, A.; Vibranovski, M.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y. E.; Long, M.
Show abstract
It is a conventionally held dogma that the genetic basis underlying development is conserved in a long evolutionary time scale. Ample experiments based on mutational, biochemical, functional, and complementary knockdown/knockout approaches have revealed the unexpectedly important role of recently evolved new genes in the development of Drosophila. The recent progress in the analyses of gene effects and improvements in the computational identification of new genes, which has led to large sample sizes of new genes, open the door to investigate the evolution of gene essentiality with a phylogenetically high resolution. These advancements also raised interesting issues related to phenotypic effect analyses of genes, particularly of those that recently originated. Here we reported our analyses of these issues, including the dating of gene ages, the interpretation of RNAi data that may confuse false positive/false negative rates, and the potential confounding impact of compensation and developmental effects that were not considered during previous CRISPR knockout experiments. We further analyzed new data from knockdowns of 702 new genes (~66% of total 1,070 Drosophila melanogaster new genes), revealing a similarly high proportion of essential genes from recent evolution, compared to those found in distant ancestors of D. melanogaster. Knockout of a few young genes detected analogous essentiality. Furthermore, our experimentally determined distribution and comparison of knockdown efficiency in different RNAi libraries provided valuable data for general functional analyses of genes. Taken together, these data, along with an improved understanding of the phenotypic effect analyses of new genes, provide further evidence to the conclusion that new genes in Drosophila quickly evolved essential functions in viability during development.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct gene expression dynamics in germ line and somatic tissue during ovariole morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster 95%
- The assembled and annotated genome of the pigeon louse Columbicola columbae, a model ectoparasite 95%
- A cohort of Caenorhabditis species lacking the highly conserved let-7 microRNA 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ongoing transposition in cell culture reveals the phylogeny of diverse Drosophila S2 sub-lines. 95%
- Large-scale transgenic Drosophila resource collections for loss- and gain-of-function studies 95%
- Functional unit and regulatory mechanisms of supergene in female-limited Batesian mimicry of Papilio polytes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid gene evolution in an ancient post-transcriptional and translationalregulatory system compensates for meiotic X chromosomal inactivation 97%
- Run or die in the evolution of new microRNAs - Testing the Red Queen hypothesis on de novo new genes 96%
- Unravelling the genetic basis for the rapid diversification of male genital structures between Drosophila species 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The chromosomal distribution of sex-biased microRNAs in Drosophila is non-adaptive 95%
- Temporal dynamics of gene expression during metamorphosis in two distant Drosophila species 95%
- Chromosome-level reference genomes for two strains of Caenorhabditis briggsae: an improved platform for comparative genomics 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.